Amid Debate, West Deptford Employees Get 2% Raises
Township committee voted 3-2 to set pay grades higher for most West Deptford employees. The issue caused a debate among committee members.
Some West Deptford employees will see a fatter paycheck in the new year, over objections from two committeemen who said the township can’t afford it.
Township committee voted 3-2 Thursday on an ordinance fixing salary grades at higher levels, amounting to a 2 percent raise for most employees. Mayor Raymond Chintall and Committeeman Samuel Cianfarini voting against the ordinance, as they did in the first reading.
Cianfarini offered statistics to support his vote—such as the fact that one in 192 homes in New Jersey is in danger of foreclosure and that from 2002 to 2012 $1 has inflated by 28 percent. During that same time, he said, salaries in West Deptford had increased by 37 percent—and for that reason he could not vote for the ordinance.
Committeewoman Denice DiCarlo questioned why Cianfarini didn’t discuss the statistics with the committee earlier.
“Giving it now, this late in the game, is just too late,” DiCarlo said.
Reiterating DiCarlo’s point, Committeewoman Donna Szymborski said committee had previously discussed the pay grades.
“We all knew,” Szymborski said. “This is what we all talked about.”
Szymborski later voted for the ordinance, but noted that she wanted pay grades examined more closely in the coming year.
Chintall concluded the committee’s discussion by stating that the “bleeding” in West Deptford has to stop, saying that it would affect the budget and impact future generations in West Deptford.
The salary ordinance also brought discussion from Gloucester City resident John Schmidt, who had previously expressed concern with the township’s regular pay raises.
While he previously inquired about raises for township employees for the last past years, he again asked Township Administrator Eric Campo for the raises in 2007 and 2008—both of which were 4 percent.
Schmidt reminded committee that some towns in Gloucester County had not given a raise to township employees in years.
“That’s a lot,” said Schmidt. “I don’t understand how a township can give a 2 percent raise, year after year.”
Chintall later said he could empathize with township employees, after working in the public sector, but believes that “financial bleeding” must stop soon. With the township in $163 million of debt, Chintall says committee must look frankly at West Deptford’s financial situation. He estimates the pay increase will cost an additional $60,000-$70,000 for the township this year.
grinch
8:59 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
The more money they get the less they'll do.
keep expenses down get rid of the dead wood and i'm sure there are plenty that will save money
government_watchdog
9:22 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
There you have it, Tax and Spend Liberals at their best. They voted as if it was truly the end of the world on the 21st. I'm surprised they didn't vote them a 500 % increase but fortunately we survived and now have to deal with the 2%. Denise "CPA" Dicarlo's evasive maneuver saying that Sam Cianfarinis's statistics should have come sooner, now it's too late, was lame at best. Saving this town money is never too late. You should have voted No. Donna "I'll think about it next year" Zymborski, I know, you're just being Donna, nothing more to say. Sean "I want to look good to my employee buddies" Kilpatrick, You have an infantile understanding of how government works. You have been on the fence for a while but now I would consider you to be part of the problem. You should have voted No. To all of those who voted Yes, I would ask you, how are you going to pay for this increase. I would suggest eliminating the entire Fiscal department and putting it in the hands of an outside vendor. That just might offset this increase. Something for the other departments to consider though, If privatizing works for one department, it just might work for all. Enjoy your big 2% while it lasts.
William Libby
1:04 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Hey Brandon,
Sam is in charge of finance and had no problem approving the increases in May. Ken got it right. He thought he could pull a fast one and claim to be fiscally responsible by trying to vote no now even though he approved them previously. He sounded like the fool he is by throwing out statistics from 2010 that pointed out good people who lost their jobs. Had nothing to do with increases. I heard he got called on it and looked like a bumbling idiot with no answers. Never mind Cimino continues to contribute to the GOP all the while collecting over 200k (four times the amount of the approved increases). Sam was pretty quiet about his wife getting much more than 2% from her teaching job. Did we mention the benefits he collects from the school. He epitomizes the word hypocrisy.
David Sileo
10:25 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
Most of the township employees I know are great people and they as all of us deserve and could use an increase in wages given the current economic climate and how it effects families. The debate whether they should or have should not received the raise is one issue.
The other issue here and more importantly is the inability for the committee to come to consensus on the important issues and the constant ad nauseam rhetoric; " I was just handed this before the meeting" or "this is the first time im seeing this" or "why didn't you bring this up before".
Mr Cianfrrani may have given some specific facts that you were not exactly aware of is one thing but to say "why didn't you discuss these statistics before" is an utterly rediculious statement. Mrs DiCarlo did you not realize that we are in a foreclosure crisis in this country and oh yeah NJ too? Did you not know the inflation rate was high despite not know the actual percentage and a 37% increase in WD salaries since then.
It is one thing to defend your position with facts but not this continual banter of Mrs Cymborski and yourself that every piece of communication is not shared. If I here it one more time I'm gonna vomit.
And to the test of the committee maybe you should devise a working plan to share all of the relevant information prior to the meetings so this cannot be used as a lame defense.
William Libby
12:50 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Mr. Sileo. Your comments are moronic and you can't spell either. From what I hear you weren't even at the meeting so you must have gotten your information from Sam I am. Go back to discussing your cell tower and solar panel issues because you are clueless. Must have spent too much time picking up the money for turkeys at Club Champagne!
David Sileo
10:26 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
In closing.....
Finally, each committee member should never forget why one holds political offiice and work for the people by the people not for yourselves.
Occupant
10:56 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
If you closed your eyes at the meeting you would think you were at a Docimo township meeting.... Spend, spend, spend with no end and the party faithful clapping their approval.
W.D.78
11:56 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
So your telling us the residents that even the employee's that stole from us (i.e.) the water department also got raises?There are a lot of good people working at the twp. but there is also some bums,everyone deserves a raise but now is not the time,my company put a freeze on all raises until the economy gets better. This is just unbelievable they voted for this during the current state were in.
H Monzo
3:34 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
if our taxes go up the ones to blame our the people that voted in Dicarlo. if it does it won't hurt my pocketbook but there are a lot of residents that live pay check to pay check if they got a paycheck coming in at all.
maybe it's time for pink slips instead of raising taxes to offset this 2% raise.
with this economy struggling and many people's in come on a frozen status,this is not really the good time to increase their income especially since they been getting raises every year.
Dicarlo I voted for you and now i'm sorry i did.
you should be barred from politics forever you are not for the people.
Ken
3:47 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Why did the mayor and Sam vote the raise in the budget but want to shoot it down now? Oh they knew they didn't have the votes to stop it, so now they can look like the hero's trying to save the tax payers thousands of dollars with out actually cutting anything. I would guess they asked Sean to vote yes just to cover their backs. Why wasn't this shot down back in April when it should have been. Those two are very wishey washy. They look very untrustworthy lately.
government_watchdog
4:40 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
They voted it down every time it was raised ... Please pay attention to where you get your information.
feddd upp
4:17 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY did the past administartion steal from the residents.
WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY did the past administration LIED to the people of this township.
WHEN WHEN WHEN WHEN WHEN will the people realize that the taxes in this town are going up because of the democRATS vote.
Carrie
9:44 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
I swear they must get together and decide who gets to be the "good guys" on each subject to try to pull the wool over our eyes. I am so tired of hearing, "I deserve..." The fact of the matter is that you don't always get what you deserve and sometimes you don't deserve what you get. On my street and the street next to me, alone, we have FIVE empty, forclosed homes. The eyesores that these homes have become/are becoming are only reflected in the resale value of our homes, not the assessed value. So while our homes are assessed at and we are paying taxes on $150,000, they are actually only worth 2/3 of that. The twp., is not only doing a poor job of running our town and managing our money, they are doing a poor job of maintaining the value that we do have. If they want a raise, here's a novel idea...WORK for it! Employees of WD are enjoying their lives and living in comfort, while some of us are wondering how we are going to make our next mortgage payment, keep the heat on and wondering how we are going to provide a decent Christmas for our children. Wake up and join the rest of the world. Most of us are broke.
Denice Zerber
8:25 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
I got to laugh at William Libby's comments,you must have gotten beat up a lot when you were a kid.your statements are false and typical dumocrat full of lies. before you post get your frickin facts right.your nothing but a loud mouth individual that doesn't know what he's talking about.
You got to be a hated individual because you have a lot of hate in you.
As far as this raise is concerned with the way the economy is struggling what the committee should do is get rid of all the employees and i'm sure with people looking for work hire and pay them half. A ton of money will be saved and with the past admin putting this town in such a mess it would bring back a little.
William Libby
9:25 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012
Everything stated was factual. Sam's wife did get well more than 2% and he is taking the benefits as well but chooses to vote no for a lesser increase. You must be a typical repugnican who tries to deflect the facts. Sam was sent here from God, according to him, but yet he is ok taking donations for needy kids from a strip club. He is a hypocrite and they are the facts!
realtruth
9:41 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
Is that the strip club that the past democrats allowed in town William?
realtruth
9:42 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012
And.......does it really matter where the money comes from to help the less fortunate whether its the steel workers union (oh no, they didn't give this year) Angelini (oh no he didn't give this year), the WD Democrat club (oh no they didn't give this year) or a strip club? I am sure the families that need the help don't ask where it came from. And since very little people know where that money came from, we will be able to figure you out Libby (A township employee) and you will be like the Finance department next.
What was really cool this year with the toy drive, no cheap photo op or the Mayor dressed as a santa for politic points while embarrassing the people in need. Looks like the township leadership finally has found some class
2013
6:10 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
this year the township committee and mayor collected more toys than any other previous years kudos to the mayor and Sam,the others voted the toy drive down in lieu of raises for the employees.but the mayor stood firm and said we move on.
gee did denice ask her hubby for a donation towards the toys NO!
Madeline Fucci
7:20 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012
From the recent experience I had with two township employees and Richard Giuliani, they need courses in customer relations and common courtesy. They haven't got a clue as to how to treat the public who are the taxpayers who provide them with their salaries and benefits. While they also pay taxes, their salaries and benefits far exceed their tax contribution.
Bob
8:40 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
Mr Libby
Thank you for the intelligent and respectful remarks. I don't believe what Mr Cianfrani shared was novel information when defending his decision not to support the 2% raise. I did say in the same post that I believe the raise is well deserved and also called on the committee to work together in providing information in a timely manner. So in my opinion my comments define moronic. As for the spelling I aopogoze I generally rip this posts out quickly on my phone and my fat thumbs often span too many keys.
As far as the cell tower and solar panels; where are they? That is bipartisan effort that to this point are proving successful. Strange, I don't know you yet you seem to know me, moron and opponent of the tower and panel project. I look forward to discussing these issues in person.
Finally, the Champaign club? Turkeys? What are you talking about? Something you want to tell us? Have you seen me there? Do you frequent there? Please tell us.
Happy Holidays. Dave
government_watchdog
8:55 am on Monday, December 24, 2012
Dave, Libby is known to most in this town as a Democrat union goon and his remarks should be ignored. He brings nothing to this forum to discuss. Just lies and innuendos.
Tom Stanton
9:03 am on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
It is not about D and R. This is not about Sam's wife's teachers union fighting for a raise that the BOE approved. It is not about who did or did not contribute to a toy drive. This is about the tax payers in this town. This is about basic economics we all should have learned in our government ran public schools paid for by the tax payers. If you have a mountain of debt to conquer, do you continue frivolous spending? Simple questions to answer:
-Is the tax payers money, the tax payer's money or money the government allows the tax payer to keep?
-Does the tax payer ever pay enough and the beneficiaries of taxes ever get enough?
-If the employees "deserve" a raise, does the tax payer and their families deserve a fiscally responsible government?
I guess this is what we get when we have three committee members, all who voted for the raise, who have private jobs which are propped up by the federal government bail outs and unconstitutional spending such as PBS.
Madeline Fucci
2:19 pm on Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Tom I couldn't agree more. Your comments are right on target. Too bad most of these tax and spend politicians are very frugal when it comes to supporting any charitable gestures at their own expense. It's always easy to spend other people's money. Even when they are exposed at a public meeting they have short pockets. Case in point the use of Riverwinds by the Hybernia Association. As I recall, Ray and Sam contributed personally, Sean was embarrassed into making a donation (especially after Larry Wallace wrote a check for $700) , however, Denice and Donna didn't step up to the plate with the other committee members and make a donation to the charitable event that sparked so much controversy.