patching...
Update: Did you take pictures from the West Deptford High School prom? Upload them to our gallery. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Minimum Age for RiverWinds Senior Membership Could Increase

With the prospect of increasing revenue for the community center, the township committee debates raising the senior membership age from 55-years-old to 62-years-old.

 

Talks of upping the age for a RiverWinds senior membership may have some West Deptford residents waiting a bit longer for a discounted rate. Deputy Mayor Sean Kilpatrick discussed several ideas with the township committee Thursday night, in regard to amending the qualifying age for a senior membership at RiverWinds Community Center.

With no resolution adopted yet, Kilpatrick asked the committee to discuss four different options for senior membership, the first two coming from the RiverWinds Advisory Board and the other two a product of discussions between he and RiverWinds Board Chair Jeff Hansen.

The first of the ideas would be to raise the senior membership age to 62-years-old across the board, with all those who are now 55-years-old as of now being grandfathered in as long as they are currently a member of the RiverWinds. The second idea being that the senior membership age be upped to 62-years-old for non-residents and remain at 55-years-old for residents.

In addition, ideas stemming from talks between Kilpatrick and Hansen also included keeping the senior membership age 55-years-old for those living in the RiverWinds development or also just keeping the status quo.

“I figure I’d just bring up all the proposals discussed,” said Kilpatrick following the township committee meeting. “ No idea is a bad idea.”

Committeewoman Denice DiCarlo conferred with solicitor Lilia Londar— standing in for Anthony Ogozalek—on the legal implications of amending the policy, specifically if the township committee set one age for one group of members and another age for the rest. Londar explained that while changing the age across the board would not been seen as discriminatory, “cherry-picking”—as DiCarlo phrased it—could potentially be viewed in such a way.

Kilpatrick explained the ideas proposed by the RiverWinds Advisory Board are just a step in the board’s goals to increase revenue for the community center.

Hansen also weighed in during discussion explaining that upping the age would increase revenue for RiverWinds with an estimated 1, 036 members not yet 55-years-old. In addition, Hansen explained that raising the age to 62-years-old would bring in an extra seven years of revenue the community center would otherwise not have, but had no exact figures making it hard to say just how much.

Committeeman Samuel Cianfarini also proposed the idea of advertising the change in senior age membership a month or two in advance, giving those who are 55-years-old and older a chance to sign up in order to be grandfathered in to the old policy. RiverWinds manager Greg Black acknowledged that a grace period such as the one proposed would provide time to work out any of the issues that may arise during the switchover.  

DiCarlo also raised concerns about a potential change in policy, since RiverWinds was built as a part of a 55 and older community.

Even though the age of senior membership would be upped, Hansen explained that the potential change to policy would not affect the senior center, which would remain open to those 55 and older.

“That’s only one piece of RiverWinds,” replied DiCarlo, going onto say that the nearby RiverCove condominium development does not have its own gym.

Concluding the discussion, Kilpatrick stated that more analysis would have to be conducted in order to explore the different options and also to look at different examples of how the grandfather rule would be applied, in order to eliminate potential gray areas brought by the change in policy.

“I would like to develop this and have it before the committee at next work session,” said Cianfarini, encouraging the proposal to be fleshed out in order to be brought to the table.

According to the RiverWinds website, the cost for an annual senior membership for a resident is $93.50, and $156.00 for two seniors with the same address—if paid in full. More than twice the amount of a senior membership, the price for an adult resident membership paid in full  is $237.00 for the year and $474.00 for a family, which includes two adults and two children.

Related Topics: 55+ communites, RiverWinds Community Center, RiverWinds membership, Rivercove, Senior communities, and senior membership

Jon Ackley

2:07 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013

I reside in the riverwinds community and been there for 6 years i'm 55 now and bought my house whenI was 49.I reside on Aztec ave. no one questioned about my age.I had the cash and they took it.
my opinion and of course opinions are like a-holes everyone has one.
they should raise it to 65 or 66 that's being a senior not 55 to 64. people at that age are still employed but once you hit retirement age the not so lucky the income is downsized somewhat.any move like this could result in an illegal act by messing with the age.

Reply

Wayne Klotz

2:46 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013

That's how the republicans work!!!

Reply

Thomas J. Nocella

2:56 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013

Jon, some people retire at ages 55 and or at 62. The age should or perhaps be raised to 62 but not strictly 65.

Reply

Thomas J. Nocella

3:07 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013

Also, I don't agree with that those living in the 55 and older should be exempt from whatever is decided. All WD residents pay taxes and Riverwinds was suppose to be built for residents only. Now I understand it is open to businesses in WD that pay taxes and that is OK with me. However, if revenue is what you want to increase, please make sure that all those who use it for example, basketball and or baseball/softball clinics and camps, pay a rental fee. They are benefiting by charging a player a fee or benefiting their coaching careers. Afterall, If I was to go to Pilates and or Yoga classes, I have to pay in addition to my annual membership fees.

Reply

ironhead

6:27 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013

i would be willing to bet the lost income due to the number of lost memberships over this will far out weigh any projected increase in revenue in this matter' sam and ray want riverwinds closed and this is part of their plan to turn it into such a financial burden that it will have to close these guy have to go tarting with flip flop boy this nov !

Reply
Comment_arrow

WD taxpayer

5:21 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

Ironhead - you must be one of the many that enjoys a free family membership!

William Kullnic

10:02 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013

I don't think they want riverwinds closed I think you ironhead want it closed.
first they would get a lot more to join if they took David Shields name off the buiding.what the hell did he do to deserve that play pocketball with Sweeney.
i'm not republican or democrat but living in this town for the past 31 years the dumocrats ruined this township.
Riverwinds as far as i'm concerned is an eyesore.thank God i'm a federal employee and looking forward to my retirement in 2 years.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ironhead

8:26 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013

thank god you are retireing that will be one more leak in the federal payroll pluged

ironhead

5:35 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

to wd taxpayer it took you thirteen days to come up with that as a comback no wonder your team couldn't win the whitehouse in response to your comment no i do not recive free membership i pay.full freight and hardly ever use my membership so riverwinds makes money off of me .

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The West Deptford Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks