patching...
Update: Did you take pictures from the West Deptford High School prom? Upload them to our gallery. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

West Deptford Official Charged with Lewdness

Scott Kintzing, chairman of the township Planning Board, was allegedly naked when a female custodian confronted him outside Oakview Elementary School.

 

The chairman of the township Planning Board has been charged with lewdness for allegedly stripping naked outside a local school after taking part in a basketball game. 

Scott Kintzing, 59, was served with a summons on Nov. 12, said West Deptford Police Chief Craig Mangano. 

The incident happened about 7:30 p.m. Oct. 23 outside Oakview Elementary School, Mangano said Monday. It was captured on security footage of school grounds.

A female school custodian witnessed Kintzing changing his clothes outside the back of the school after the game. The custodian told police Kintzing was completely naked when she confronted him. After the custodian confronted Kintzing, he drove off, Mangano said. 

School officials were notified of the incident and contacted township police, who conducted an investigation. 

No children were present at the time of the incident, Mangano said. 

Kintzing could not immediately be reached for comment Monday. 

His attorney, Jeffrey V. Puff of Woodbury, said Monday afternoon he believes the charge will ulitmately be resolved "favorably" for his client. 

"The charge is unfortunate," Puff said. "There were 15 guys playing basketball that night."

Puff declined further comment on the incident. 

The charge against Kintzing was transferred from the township's Municipal Court to Mantua's to avoid any potential conflict of interest since Kintzing is a public official in West Deptford. No hearing date has been set, a Mantua court official said Monday afternoon. 

If convicted of lewdness, Kintzing faces a maximum sentence of six months in jail and a $1,000 fine. 

Kintzing, a banker, has been a member of the Rowan University Foundation Board of Directors since 2008. 

He had a long career at The Bank (now known as Fulton Bank), ascending to chief executive officer in 2005, and later vice chairman and president of the New Jersey division of Fulton Bank. He retired from the bank in July 2011.

In August of that year, he was named market president of Mount Laurel-based Cornerstone Bank.

Kintzing's son, Hunter, ran unsuccessfully for a township committee seat as a Democrat in 2011. 

(Editor's note: This story was updated at 2:25 p.m. Nov. 19 with comments from Scott Kintzing's attorney and at 12:50 p.m. Nov. 20 with information about the security footage.)

Related Topics: Lewdness, Oakview Elementary School, Scott Kintzing, and West Deptford planning board

omg

2:20 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

wow it was true sweeney you gonna get him out of this one.
some things just never change yeh people of west deptford votes for crooks and fraud and who knows what else.it ain't hush hush now
Klutz friend of yours

Comment_arrow

WifeofaCop

9:20 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

OK, first off.... if you knew Scott, you would know he is the furthest thing from a crook or a fraud! he was getting changed, END OF STORY! maybe it was a bad decision to get changed out of the car, but everyone makes mistakes! Itll all be cleared up in court.

al henry

2:48 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Who confronts someone in public that is totally naked? Unless you know that person very well your not near him. Duh...

Comment_arrow

Another voice

2:55 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Love how you try to turn this around and make it about the custodian....Duh.

Comment_arrow

al henry

5:21 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Not trying to turn this around at all. The custodian (male/female or otherwise) should have immediately called police. Of course he is in the wrong for being naked in public. I hope you would not confront a naked stranger or someone acting "out of sorts".

Greg Adams

2:52 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Changing your clothes after a game of basketball is considered lewd?

Comment_arrow

Duchess

3:35 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Please, please, please do not try and defend this man. He took his clothes off in school grounds, YES Mr Adams that is lewd, how would you feel if your child was at that school and there was a man walking around naked, not too happy I would expect.

Comment_arrow

Greg Adams

3:55 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

As I read this article, my kids chances of walking into the locker room at Riverwinds and seeing the same thing are infinitely greater than they were seeking him that night. THERE WERE NO KIDS AT THE SCHOOL!

Comment_arrow

Another voice

4:19 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Mr. Adams,
That is why there is a Family Locker Room at Riverwinds. You have the CHOICE then of having your kids walk in that room. Even so, why should the custodian have had to see that? People do not routinely get naked outside to change their sweaty clothes! So, in response to your latter post, NO, I haven't been naked changing my clothes outside!

Comment_arrow

Greg Adams

4:30 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

There are kids in the men's and I'll assume the women's locker rooms each and every time that I go to Riverwinds. Along side of them are people changing.

The facts are what they are. He was playing basketball and changed his clothes after the game, outside, at night, when he thought he was by himself. No children were present. I'll say it again, at worst this was a stupid thing for him to do. But it was not lewd. Spin it however you want to spin it, make up and add whatever facts you want to add, it doesn't change what actually happened.

Comment_arrow

Another voice

4:54 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

I am not saying that isn't exactly what happened. It likely is. However, according to the law that constitutes a lewd act. Spin it any way you want....

Comment_arrow

Greg Adams

5:21 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Thanks to "Few and Proud" below, I have now read the lewdness statute. After doing so I am even move convinced that this does not constitute lewdness. I've talked to 4 people who have played basketball there for years and the have all told me that they are the only people there when they play basketball. Therefore, I do not think it would be reasonable for him to EXPECT to see someone while he was changing. One person told he he's probably walked out of the gym 100 times after playing and never saw anyone other than the guys playing basketball.

Comment_arrow

Another voice

5:31 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Sorry, I totally disagree. If you are outside, you are in a public place. You should ALWAYS EXPECT to see someone in a public place. Hence the term public.

Comment_arrow

Kristi Simpkins

5:50 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

It depends on where you change your clothes. In this case yes it would be considered Lewd.
He couldn't wait until he got home to changed?
Wow!

Duchess

3:01 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

I cannot believe what I am reading. Why is this man walking naked in my child's school??? The charge is unfortunate??? He was NAKED. I also understand that there was a Brownie troop meeting going on in the school, what if one of those girls had come out and seen this pervert, what a disgusting, disgraceful man and he is a public official of WD, well he shouldn't be anymore.

Comment_arrow

Lynda Hughes

7:09 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Oh give me a break! I am a parent of 4 adult children. Everyone is so paranoid that they don't even take into consideration the intent behind his behavior. Was he hanging around the school while kids were there? No. Was there a reason he was naked? Yes - probably had someplace to go and needed to change. Did he expect to be seen? Of course not. Come on people. INTENT has to be considered. This was a totally innocent, albeit stupid. But lewd?? Ridiculous.

Comment_arrow

Diane Villecco

3:59 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Dutchess, you are the one who should be in school along with your children. You say stupid things...why don't you come out of your Dutchess disguise and let us know who is using the word "pervert" very loosely. I suggest you look up the meaning of the slanderous words you are throwing around.

Comment_arrow

WifeofaCop

9:24 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

I, actually, cannot believe your comment. very clueless and very judgemental. the man was getting changed after the mens basketball game. the brownies were gone...there were NO children there.... and yes, maybe he shouldve gotten changed in the car.. it was a bad decision... WHICH WE ALL MAKE BAD DECISIONS DAILY~ some have harsher consequences than others. it is a shame that this happened to such a great, upstanding, hard working man in the community... not to mention a giving man in our community!!!!!!! Hope since you are so worried about your children (which btw, i have 3 young girls) you are not teaching them to jump to conclusions nor be judgemental. some people just like to stir the pot and create bigger problems for others. happy wednesday!!!!

Greg Adams

3:03 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

At 7:30 at night after a game of basketball when in your mind the only possible person who might "catch" you is one of your friends? At worst, stupid. But not lewd. I'd bet that there are very few, if any, readers of this article who haven't changed outside at some point in their lives after a workout, after work, after the beach, or some other situation.

Comment_arrow

Duchess

3:35 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Mr Adams, are you out of your mind. It was 7.30 in the evening, that school is used for Brownies, Boy Scouts and many after school clubs for kids, any child could have seen this creep. My daughter attends Brownies at Oakview and leaves the school at that time. Is he a friend of yours because I cannot believe that anyone would think this is a normal, appropriate event.

Comment_arrow

Greg Adams

3:44 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Duchess, I do not know Mr. Kintzing but I know others who play basketball with him. I've heard the "Brownies" rumor and was assured that it was 110% false. They are the only people in the gym on those nights. The Chief of Police himself confirmed that no children were present. Why do you choose to ignore that? Seems to me that you have an agenda behind you.

Comment_arrow

Kristi Simpkins

6:09 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Greg,
First off this was more than just stupidity. Come on & let's be honest. Also what other ppl may have done isn't what's being discussed here. No one else has been charged w/ Lewdness or any other crime. He was. There's most likely a very good reason for that charge too. If he's innocent then that will be shown in due course.
It's bad enough that he did this. What would be worse however is to have ppl defend him & his actions. If he's wrong & better yet guilty b/c of those actions then so he is.
Plus whether children were not @ school @ the time this occurred doesn't matter. He still should not have done what he did.This was still very inappopriate for him to do. That's putting things midly.

Comment_arrow

WifeofaCop

9:26 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

I totally agree Greg! What a shame that something stupid but innocent happened to Scott! the truth always wins out in the end though!

Another voice

3:03 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

The article said that no children were present.

Robert K.

3:35 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

This is clearly another smear campaign by the republicans. So if I change my shirt after a basketball game I am charged with lewd behavior? What is this world coming to? Come on people, this is totally ridiculous.

Comment_arrow

Another voice

4:03 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Wow. The Republicans control the police department now?!

He wasn't changing his shirt, he was NAKED and outside, and after an investigation, obviously the POLICE believe there is sufficient proof to issue the summons. Just because YOU don't think it's lewd, does not mean it does not meet the legal definition required by the authorities.

Albert Niko

3:35 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

This is totally ridiculous and a new low for politics in West Deptford. Denny Forte should be proud of himself. Classless

Comment_arrow

Kristi Simpkins

6:14 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

The only one who seems to have a problem &/or a new low, would be the person who was charged w/ this crime. Just saying.

Wayne Klotz

3:38 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Omg; I know this man very well and you peoPle blew it out of portion! of course you , omg, would make a comment about me since a person is prosumer innocent instead of being guilty! But of course you already claimed him guilty!!

Comment_arrow

merideth matlack

5:27 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

he is guilty it's on video what part of that you don't understand,klotz.
it goes to show you what kind of individual you associate yourself with.
a fraudelent,naked guy who knew right from wrong.
if he goes to jail BUBBA is waiting for guys like him.

GeneSimmons78

3:53 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Lets play Devils advocate and say you are very sweaty. You want to change before you go home. Ahhhhh let me go to the mens room and change. I believe they have little boys rooms in the school.

Comment_arrow

mar93woo

4:28 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

The man was naked and they have a tape he is on camera are some of you people nuts!! He should be punished for this uncalled for act of being naked on school grounds. I don't commit on this but lets be realistic about this whole thing. The man was caught and supeonaed last week and we are just finding out about this. I have grandchildren and I would be appalled if my grandchildren saw him.

Duchess

4:12 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Read Jessica Binders post Mr Adams, you obviously have got your facts very wrong.

Few & Proud

4:46 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

2C:14-4. Lewdness

a. A person commits a disorderly persons offense if he does any flagrantly lewd and offensive act which he knows or reasonably expects is likely to be observed by other non consenting persons who would be affronted or alarmed.

School grounds are highly regarded by the courts, If this act occurred ;later, then maybe the possibility of no children were in the area, but that school has functions/practices that happen in/around 730 at night.

Most of the WD schools have cameras that record for security. If SK is visible on camera, naked, then his defense is more difficult than word from a witness.

mar93woo

4:50 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Mr. Niko, why are you blaming Mr. Forte for this, he was'nt naked and I am sure he would not do something like walking around a school naked. You are disgusting for blaming someone else for Mr. Kintsing being so stupid as to walking around a school naked when there ws a brownie troop at the schol having a meeting. Evidently you have no children and would probably do the same thing. What he did is morally wrong and has no common sense.

John Daniels

5:21 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

I hope he banned for life from school and municipal grounds!! This is totally unacceptable behavior. WTH is wrong with people. I hope the school board acts swiftly on this and places a lifetime ban on this man! If this was anyone else, that is exactly what would have been done!

merideth matlack

5:22 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

however the female custodian approached him and did say I thought you'd be bigger let's get one thing clear g adams this happened last week and a couple of people on here were saying that a naked man was caught around oakview school but no name was revealed and when it was mentioned it was a democrat and a well known person i'm surprised it wasn't brought out in the open then and lauren burgoon knew about this last week.
you can't cover it up when the proof is on video.
sometimes you got to think before you act but since he thought well i'm a democrat and i have a lotta pull ( no pun intended ) in the township i'll be safe i'll get the same attorney that Sweeney has.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Lauren Burgoon

5:23 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

merideth matlack, We started looking into it as soon as we had info. Today was the earliest day police could get us information from the report.

John Daniels

5:21 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

And how is this not front page news in the GC Times??? The public needs to know about these type of people. Hopefully the police do a background check on him and make sure he has no other instances like this. Would be nice to know our children our safe.

Nicki

6:19 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Your insinuations of Mr Kintzing being a pedafile are ludicrous!!! And of Lewd behavior...not so much!! Good god people he was changing his clothes after a basketball game!! And again...there were no children present!! This situation has escalated to an unnecessary degree!

Comment_arrow

Another voice

6:46 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

I agree with Nicki on this. Don't read into it or jump to conclusions or make false accusations. The man got dressed outside. He was wrong. He was issued a summons. End of story.

redneckwillie3

6:53 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

these few people on here defending this guy,he did an act that he shouldn't have done,whether he plays basketball there a 100 times the fact of the matter he got caught.how many times did he do this without being caught.
the bottom line is there is proof according to a video,so what is his defense.
i'm sure if it was john doe up the street he would be in jail waitng for an arraignment.
the trouble with this town it's democrats this and republicans that.
Would it matter what affiliation we are if we were hit with a disater the first thing we would do is help our neighbor no matter what he or she is.
he committed a crime he should be punished for it>>>>>

Wayne Klotz

7:03 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Nicki, I agree! People on this patch have already said he's guilty before evidence is presented!! But, look what party they belong to when they speak before facts and I know who they are! Am I right, guys??

Carrie

9:09 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

"The Planning Board chairman is charged after allegedly stripping down after hours at Oakview Elementary School."
When I first read the intro. to the article posting, I thought the man was wandering the halls, stark naked. I'm sure, after reading the comments, I wasn't alone. After reading the article, I do however see the truth. Unfortunately, again, after reading the comments, it appears that many read the intro & went no further.
So, my long winded comment is this. 1st of all, when driving passed a school, you look around for kids. If you see none, you continue @ the current rate of speed, because no kids are present & the speed zone does not apply, it goes by the presense of kids. So, just because this man was not putting on a show for a room full of kids, doesn't mean there was no risk of a kid seeing him. I can say that my son has, on more than one occasion, been found playing football behind Oakview. Even without an organized event. It is a public building/property.
Personally, I would fine him, ban him from public office & have him do some community service. Maybe have him clean the school restrooms. The school should also stop allowing people to use the gyms. One last thing, when I go to RW, I expect to find people in various stages of undress, use the family room, & protect my kids the best I'm able to. However, when they are in ANY kind of parking lot, I'm not prepared & neither are my kids. There is no arguement, no defence there.

Kristi Simpkins

9:09 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

For all ppl who say "there were no children present", what if in fact there actually were children present? What about that? That's a really scary thought to me.
I'm actually very glad that there were not any children present to see a 60 yr old man in that manner. Eww!
Also just b/c there were no children present doesn't mean a person still commits an act such as this.
Plus how could anyone not be aware of cameras outside of a school? DUH! The one person who saw him that way was one to many.
He made a VERY poor decision to get changed outside. Any way you look @ this this was WRONG!!!
I don't know know the guy. However that being said I have no idea why he or anyone else, would make such a terrible decision to do what he did. Especially on school property.
WTH was he thinking? Oh that's right. He wasn't.

Bob

9:09 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Totally naked, I doubt it. The guy was probably doing a quick change discreetly and caught off guard. This is common among guys. We urinate in bushes, on trees behind sheds. We all do it. We are just really good about not being noticed, sometimes we get caught, very rare though.

Comment_arrow

Occupant

10:14 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

There's no excuse for a man in his 50's Your not 14 anymore ... I hope.

mar93woo

9:09 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Wayne, you are an idiot, he was wrong lets just face the facts. I don't care if hes Democrat or Republican what he did was wrong. He needs to be punished for what he did my God it was a school that has a video camera and got him on Camera. Let me tell you this. If my grandchildren where there and saw him naked. I would get a lawyer real fast and file chargers against him.

JB

9:09 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Absolutey nuts...this happens all the time..there is no lewdness..A guy played basketball..came out thinking it was just guys from his game and changed in his car...that's it..nothing more..He is a wonderful Family man ..Dad ..and grandparent..with an impecible record..It's crazy to see these crazy posts...Scott is a great guy..dosent deserve this...at all

Comment_arrow

Nicki

9:40 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

I wholeheartedly agree! Perhaps these people should refrain from their inaccurate accusations without actually the person that Scott is! A great guy!!

Comment_arrow

Kristi Simpkins

12:13 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

JB,
For one, this kind of incident does NOT happen all the time. Never heard of this before & I have lived here in this township for a very very long time. Second there was lewdness. Or @ least there was enough evidence to charge him for that.
It's bad enough what he did. BTW there's video of this guy on the school security camera. Smart guy.

I don't what's worse. Seeing him on camera or seeing ppl on this thread defending him. If he's wrong then he's wrong.

Comment_arrow

Another voice

9:51 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Nice little distortion of the facts there, JB. He did not get "changed in his car". He was OUTSIDE. Someone saw him and this fact leads to a legal definition of lewdness for his actions.

Now, as for the other insinuations, there is no basis for those. I agree.

Comment_arrow

Duchess

9:52 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

That's not what I know of him. I know people that work out at the gym with him who find him quite an idiot, he parades himself around the locker room and thinks he's God's gift, as for a family man, I don't think so!!

Comment_arrow

Karl Kinkler

6:06 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

For people to resort to name calling do not know his character. He made a mistake. But it is something I know others have done because they don't want to sweat all over their upholstery. The law has to prove that it was likely someone would have seen him, regardless of where it happened.

Comment_arrow

Duchess

6:23 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

So Mr Kinkler are you are telling me it's quite normal for guys to strip down naked a walk around outside a elementary school ?? I do not think that is normal and many, many, many people in WD are very upset about this so called family man. I cannot believe anyone in their right mind would do something like this, it's totally disgusting and please do not try and defend him and tell me and the people of this town that it's a normal thing to do.

Occupant

9:40 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

HELLO? THE MAN WAS OUTSIDE AND HE WAS N A K E D .... WHAT PART OF NAKED DON'T YOU PEOPLE UNDERSTAND... CAN I STAND OUTSIDE YOUR HOUSE NAKED? AND IT'S OK? GET REAL FOLKS,,
WHAT'S THERE TO DEFEND?

HE WAS N A K E D, N A K E D, N A K E D!!!!

na·ked/ˈnākid/
Adjective:
1.(of a person or part of the body) Without clothes.
2.(of an object) Without the usual covering or protection:i.e. "a naked man".

redneckwillie3

9:41 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

the guy is a complete idiot.there are facilities in the school he could have changed.but he decided he was safe and he went outside.
first of all why was he playing basketball in that particular elementary and I say ELEMENTARY school.there are courts at riverwinds and changing areas for such activity.
lewdness can be a little far fetched but it was an indecent act and it so happens he got caught.of course it's the same person that was or is involved in the missing 4,5 million.i'm sure the family is feeling the humiliation of this act and it's a shame for them.like anything else he's a democrat and they get away with anything in this county,just maybe this will be different.

Charby

9:44 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

Stop being so prudish! He was changing after a basketball game... no one was hurt, no children about. Such nonsense people get their noses out of joint about!
What JB said!!

Comment_arrow

Another voice

9:51 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

The law is the law, and you do not just get to ignore the ones you don't like. And the argument that no one was hurt doesn't matter one little bit. Prudish or not, our laws still say it is improper to be naked outside, and breaking that law is actionable.

government_watchdog

9:49 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

You have to admit, If it was some hot teacher babe nothing would be said, Right guys?

KHambor

10:28 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012

ok...whoever makes excuses for this guy is insane.....he should have gone home to get undressed...why was it so important to do it outside....were his clothes on fire or something......exhibitionism at its best....outside at an elementary school...he should be arrested....or at least taken to a doctor....wow...

This is Silly

9:50 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

This is about a Female who saw a man naked at her place of employment. She did not see him naked in the BOYS bathroom, or the BOYS locker room, she saw him naked in the ........PARKING LOT!. He should be charged and he should be found guilty and he should serve whatever a jury of his peers says he should serve. The Custodian rightfully brought this forward as she has rights and a duty to report on behalf of the children she serves. My hat off to her.

Wayne Klotz

9:51 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Just one question for all you so called people who say that mr. Kintzing is guilty; DID Y OU ALL SEE THE VIDEO ATALL? I guess you people did not because you guys have only heard one side of the whole truth!! Or is that to easy for you people to understand? Maybe before you pass judgement on somebody check out the whole truth not but what somebody says! Remember this;! A person is innocent until proven guilty which I find you people have!!!

villanness

9:51 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

he literally got caught with his pants down.
but the incident took place back in October.did they wait to reveal this story after the election since he supported the democratic machine.
why did it surface now instead of a month ago.
it's not so much what happened it's the person who got caught,he's the one who has to face people he knows well and comes in contact with on an everyday basis.
I don't think the penalty should be that STIFF.

Tiredofdrama

9:51 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

How is anybody defending this behavior?? It doesn't matter if there weren't any planned children events at the school. It's a public area. It was Oct 23 so 730 was pretty much still light out. so there could ahve been kids riding there bikes through the school or walking through from the High school. There are people that live all around the school. I'm sure this wasn't the 1st time he did it just the 1st time he got caught doing it. It is unacceptable to do this in any public area ever!!!!

John Cokos

9:51 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Not so fast, folks. Maybe he was checking for Code Violations, give him the benefit of the doubt.....

sandie

9:52 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Much ado about not much at all. The man was changing clothes at night after playing basketball. Not walking around naked. Not exposing himself to a brownie troop. Don't custodians clean inside the school at night, and by 7:30pm in Oct, it was dark, so why was the female custodian out there? The article doesn't mention a video of the event. Issuing a summons is not proof of anything. If the police had not issued one, given this mans public standing, all hell would break loose and the police would be under fire. It's interesting to see how outraged and sanctimonious the comments are. As for me, I'm sitting back waiting for the rest of the information before passing judgment.

sandie

11:35 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

He was said to be naked. Was he really? Just have the unnamed female custodians word for it. One thing I've learned in my life, just cause someone says it, doesn't make it true.

villanness

11:04 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

that's the reason he was caught the police saw the video otherwise it would be his word against hers.how people can be so stupid.
no matter he finally got caught after how many times he has done this before at this site or another.common sense would tell you there is facilities in the school he could change not outside .wayne you really sticking up for this guy.you must be hot tub buddies

Robin Stanton

12:31 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

I’m seriously disgusted with what I’m reading on here. The facts are the facts. Why is this even an argument?? It was a reckless decision he made and indeed offended the custodian who caught him. I could care less WHY he was changing, there are restrooms/locker rooms provided for that reason. I could care less with WHO he is and WHO he was playing basketball with, which should have NO BEARING on right from wrong. Had this same exact situation took place except with a different individual, we wouldn’t be sitting here arguing morals and ethics. This has nothing to do with being republican or democrat, this has everything to do with an individual making a wrong decision, a decision that unfortunately for him will be handled in court. Furthermore, I’m offended and disgusted for the people who want to sit on here and TRY to justify his actions by comparing this to changing in a locker room at riverwinds. Had Mr. Kintzing changed in a locker room/bathroom in the first place, we wouldn’t be sitting here arguing right from wrong.

sandie

12:36 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

How do you know there is a video. You assume there is but you don't know. He was "caught" by the custodian. If there was a video, the article makes no mention of it. For all you know, he may have gone out to get his stuff and couldn't get back in because school doors are locked. Point is, you DON'T know and neither does anyone else commenting here. It's interesting to read how much this event has morphed into such a big deal. Guy plays basketball. Guy changes clothes at his car. Guy is seen by female custodian who is outside and confronts him (!?) Guy finishes changing and drives off. Police are called. Guy is cited. No walking around the school naked. No frightened Brownies. No bike riding children. No outraged PTA members. No reason for all this written diarrhea flowing through this page. There are aspects to be questioned, like why there was such a gap of time before he was cited? But the rest of it is unnecessary rhetoric founded on little fact and lots of assuming.

Comment_arrow

ironhead

7:03 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

perhaps the custodian should have been inside the building DOING HER JOB and not wandering around outside she is being paid to clean the building not patrol he perimiter of it

Comment_arrow

Another voice

7:12 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Maybe she was taking out the trash. Custodians are outside all the time; do you really not know that?

Comment_arrow

Another voice

7:12 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

How SAD that you would try to blame the custodian for what she saw. You are really trying to deflect, aren't you?

Patch_comments_icon

Lauren Burgoon

12:51 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Based on the many comments here, Shannon Sadler rechecked with the police chief -- there is security footage of the incident.

Comment_arrow

John Cokos

1:13 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

A Zapruder Grassy Knoll Video ? What would I do without WD for comic relief ????

Comment_arrow

JT

3:58 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Shannon felt the need to recheck with the police about security footgage but felt no need to ask about the unfounded rumors (stated as fact) that there were Brownies in the school, that he was walking around the halls, etc.? I guess clarifying those rumors makes this story a lot less juicy, and more of what it actually was (and how it has been reported by other news outlets), a man changing next to his car after a game of basketball.

redneckwillie3

3:58 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

how people can be so wrong there is footage on video stupid people now what more excuses stop sticking up for this person HE GOT CAUGHT with his pants down literally.

Wayne Klotz

3:58 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

No,John! It's the real video!! Oops!

mar93woo

3:58 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

This is unbelievable how some of you people are sticking by this JERK. OMG come back to reality he was NAKED you just don't do that in public unless you are at a nude beach beach nad Oakview school is not a nude beach.. He must think people are stupid. I have to agree why wait till now to bring out why not as soon as it happened Gerry White were you afraid Denice would lose the election!!! Lets face it Mr. Kintsing is as staunch Democrat and worked at Fulton Bank and was ask to retire from there.

JB

3:59 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

I have been laughing out Loud at the humor provided by the folks on this thread of comments..first of all Scott didnt commit an Act, he got changed, at 7:30 at night in october in the dark between two cars..thats it..No act..LOL I am amazed at the outrage..These folks better lock themselves in their homes and never go to the beach in the summer in broad daylight..people are always getting changed in their cars and sometimes outside of their cars..god forbid these folks go to a tailgating event at a stadium in philly, the lack of bathrooms over there would fill your Blogs up with people wanting to burn folks at the Stake for taking a leak outside..oh yes Girls and Guys and while we are On the Subject..lets not ever go to the elitist sport of Golf..Everyone waters a tree on the course out in public..it just happens, you try to be discreet but every once in a while your embarrased, now those things are acts..lol ..Scott was just getting changed..i never heard so much made of nothing at all..

Comment_arrow

Ed Hughes

12:58 pm on Friday, November 23, 2012

I guess he is the first West Deptford resisdent to make a mistake...he got caught getting changed after playing basketball at a grammer school...thats it ! Knowing Scott for 50 years I can assume that he was on his way to a meeting after that game...maybe the United Way, the Touchdown Club, or one of the many causes he works with. OK, its even on tape that he made a mistake but this childess name calling by those holier than thou...give me a break. Should he be fined, that is up to the judge ( althought there appears to be a lot of judges on this gossip site )...should he be given community service......he's been giving to the community his entire life !

sandie

3:59 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

John, a day without WD drama is like a day without sunshine.

Diane Villecco

6:43 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

I would like to respond to the comment made by Dutchess about Mr. Kintzing parading around like he was a big shot at Riverwinds. Her comments are given under the code name Dutchess. Sounds like this is the pot calling the kettle black. One more thing...
you aren't revealing your real name because you could be charged with slander for your outrageous comments about his character. He has more character than you do in your little pinking typing the a's on your keyboard. You are no Dutchess in my eyes...DISGUSTED W.D. BYSTANDER

Diane Villecco

6:44 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

That is little pinky that is typing your a's. DISGUSTED W.D.BYSTANDER

Bruno Pagan

8:28 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

the people on here that are defending this jerk,what do you say when you see him somewhere maybe shopping or in the bank especially how some guys are.
HEY SCOTT HOW'S IT HANGING.HAVE A GOOD DAY.
maybe the custodian thought there was a full moon out and she wanted to see it.,that's why she was outside.
this is the best story since shields said he's innocent and Docimo with none of your business.this could be a SATURDAY NIGHT SPECIAL SKIT ROTFLMAS

Duchess

8:28 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Just stating facts lady, just because you are related to him doesn't mean you have to defend him, the truth hurts.

Esther Williams

9:04 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

OK, so Mr. Kintzing isn't the community poster child we all thought and isn't perfect by showing poor judgement, changing his clothes outside on public school grounds.

Based on what I've read so far it wasn't intentional lewdness. I'm sure he was simply changing his clothes and got caught by a custodian. How many other times has he done this and was never seen. He hedged his bet changing one more time and got caught. Lesson learned. Change your clothes in a locker room or drive home in your sweaty clothes.

I agree wholeheartedly with JB's comment and commentary. He/she is spot on.

He made a mistake, let's move on. I'm sure he'll never do this again.

Ms. Matlack....really? You're going to bring politics into this?

Duchess? A pervert? Hardly....he was changing his clothes. There was no sexual intent what so ever.

ThomasJefferson

9:06 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

At what point does the Patch shut down this ridiculous waste of time as totally inappropriate. This matter is in the hands of the court. Why don't all of you find a more productive use for your time. There are a lot of positive things you could be doing besides playing judge and jury on here. This blog advertises itself as the source of community news, but rather it is a cesspool of anger, venom and hatred. The last year in West Deptford has been horrific and you should all be ashamed of yourselves. I would not let my children read anything on here because not one of you monitors your comments. You have a right to disagree with one another and have honest discourse but it should be civil.
Our community is reflected right here and it has become ridiculous.

Patch_comments_icon

Tim Zatzariny Jr.

9:11 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

JT, our original story quoted the chief stating there where no children present at the school when the incident happened.

Patch_comments_icon

Tim Zatzariny Jr.

9:12 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

"Keeping it Real," we're closely monitoring the comments on this story, and we are deleting any that violate Patch's Terms of Use.

HOG

9:50 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

I agree with you Mr. Jefferson,West deptford is the laughing stock of gloucester county.When someone ask me where I'm from I tell them other than west deptford.
For the past 25 years this town has grown into the cesspool of communities.
the current politicians in this town don't deserve to run and that goes for dems and rep.
You got committee people that lie,commit fraud,steal,the list is endless. it's got to be the most corrupt town in the county.
all of a sudden we become amish because a guy got caught changing his clothes.
should he be punished. YES! but not like a harden criminal.
i'm riding my harley down rt 55 towards the shore,girls in cars,especially convertables flash all the time . i'm sure the guy is humliated as it is.

Kristi Simpkins

8:27 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

HOG,
No offense but if you really believe that about WD & you tell ppl that you live somewhere else than you actually do live, then why would you want to remain living in that particular town?

Just curious.

Francis Dams

8:27 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Wow! So many comments on one article and they run the gamut from the sublime to the ridiculous. It does, however, give you insight as to how people think. simply amazing

WifeofaCop

9:36 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

There are degrees of Lewdness. the least being NO sexually intent. I would certainly think that making a bad choice of where to get changed does NOT constitute an action that is deserving of all these vindictive comments... mostly because he is a prominent person in our community. Obviously the people that are saying all of these ridiculously negative remarks about him, honestly DO NOT know the wonderful GOD loving man he is! The truth ALWALYS wins out... and is certainly will here as well!!! Remember that Jesus was crucified BUT rose again!!!!! happy Wednesday ya'll!

skinny dipper

2:00 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

When someone confronts you of the opposite sex and all you have on is a smile thats considered being in a lewd position.
there is proof on a video which i'm sure will be destroyed by court day because he will find someway or pay someone to lessen the charge to inexplicable nudity. if by chance he loses his job there looking for a lifeguard this summer at Sandy Beach.

This is Silly

2:09 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

So.... we have two opinions. Only the assumotion that Security camera's AND the Custodian's character and integrity prove without a doubt establish that Mr. Kintzing did in fact fully undress. They are basically - 1. It is NOT OK to fully undress in public, (including school grounds), and 2. It IS OK to fully undress in public, including school grounds, (but with the caveat that as long as employees and private citizens, including CHILDREN aren't around).

If opinion #2 is affirmed, it then begs the question: What are society's controls, (steps to protect the public, including school children), should a person undress HIM or HERSELF in public (your front lawn), and/or on Public Properties, (including school grounds)?

Francis Dams

7:39 pm on Wednesday, November 21, 2012

The privileged class do not feel they have to abide by the same rules And standards of behavior as the regular folks. They have a sense of entitlement to simply do as they please because they know they can without impunity most of the time. It will be interesting to see what now this case develops and the final results.

Jamie Gordon

5:34 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

A man's character is his character...there is no way scott is guilty...

Comment_arrow

Kristi Simpkins

1:57 am on Saturday, December 1, 2012

Jamie,
What he did has nothing to do w/ a person's character. It's all about choices & decisions ppl make.
As for Scott being guilty he was caught on camera w/ limited clothing on, changing OUTSIDE of an Elementary School. Why?
That would him or anyone else guilty of that charge. End of story.
He made a VERY poor choice to do what he did.
There's nothing that anyone can say to defend or justify his actions, in order to make any of this look better than it does. This already looks bad enough & is bad enough.

He made a choice & that poor choice got him in trouble. Instead of ppl defending him, ppl should just except this for what it is.

Defending him & his actions only make this story become worse.

Dirk Digler The Second

10:10 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

When one looks up the word flirt in Websters there is Scott's picture.

Occupant

11:11 am on Saturday, December 1, 2012

He was "N A K E D" .... End of story.

Duchess

11:11 am on Saturday, December 1, 2012

Very well said Kristi. Also I believe he was walking around naked not just changing his clothes. There isn't anything anyone can say to defend this man, he was in the WRONG. Please do not tell me what a great man he is and what he has contributed to our community over the years, that is BS and a lot of it. Nobody in their right mind would walk around naked in a Elementary School knowing full well that the school is often in use for after school activities, does this man think he above the law, I think so and I am sure with all his "pals" he will get just a slap wrist and be told he's a naughty boy. Must be nice to have friends in high places.

Comment_arrow

Garth Books

10:57 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

Duchess, if you had a long list of accomplishments and record of giving back that Scott has, maybe you could have friends in high places too. Instead you and your cronies use this sight to slander people. Guess you like having friends in low places.

Joe

10:35 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

So getting changed is performing an act of lewdness? Im sure he had no intention of anyone seeing him. If he was changing in hopes that someone would see him that is a different story. Bad judgement wrong timing. I guess no one else that has a comment on this has ever had that right? Thats right west deptford is all full of perfect people duhhhh

Kristi Simpkins

2:50 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Garth,
His record of giving back, what he has done, or what he has accomplished in his life, doesn't seem look very good now. How can it?
One bad choice by him has now tarnished everything good he has done.
That's the saddest part about his story.
How will ppl now look @ him? Especially after all of this.
Most ppl I would assume are only going to remember this bad thing. Not all the good things he has done. It's a shame too.
Because all of this could've been easily prevented.

Kristi Simpkins

2:50 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Joe,
It is an act of lewdness if someone decides to change their clothing outside of an Elementary School. Plus he may not have intended to be seen. However he was & he was also caught by a security camera. So that's why he shouldn't have done what he did.
Also this is not about people being perfect. No one is perfect.
This is just about people having & using some common sense. It's about knowing what ppl should do privately & not do outside in public.

Duchess

2:50 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Mr Books, what about the long line of times he has screwed over many residents, I can tell you he may be your friends but he is not a very liked man with a lot of people in the community. There are very many businessmen that would not deal with The Bank and will now not deal with Cornerstone because of this man, so please do not tell me what a wonderful man he is. He thinks he is above the law and as I said before with his "pals" behind him and all they stand for he will probably get away with this. He was seen at an event the other day and was parading around like he had done no wrong and with not a care in the world, I can tell you there were a lot of people there that were quite disgusted that he thinks this is all a big joke, not a very liked man I can tell you.

WifeofaCop

5:52 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Duchess. GET A LIFE, PLEASE! Every person on this Gods green earth is unliked by someone (you especially) there are SO many situations that could happen like this. It just is a shame that it happened to someone in the spot light bc town losers that sit home and contribute nothing to society feel as though our town/community representatives should be PERFECT! Well no one is but the BIG man upstairs so analyze yourself PLEASE and take ownership for all the wrong stupid things you've done! You are straight up ANNNNNOYING! And honestly, I'm sure there is a LAUNDRY list of people that don't like you, who are just waiting for you to do something stupid so we can OVER analyze you! Uggggh.

Duchess

6:20 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Wow, WifeofaCop someone has really pissed you off. No lady I would be upset if this person was known or not. My kids go to that school and attend after school activities there, I do not want them walking into a naked old man when they leave the premises, I couldn't care less if it was the President of the US or the local homeless guy the fact of the matter is he screwed up big time and I am fed of people coming onto this forum and telling me what a great guy this man is and his just made a little mistake, no he didn't, how many times has he done this before thats what I would like to know. And you really need to take a chill pill lady and calm down.

WifeofaCop

9:59 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Yes, Duchess.. Someone has pissed me off and it was you & your unneeded comments. If your children were present at 7:30pm in the dark parking lot, after a men's basketball game, then I'd say you'd be failing as a parent! and let me inform ya on something..... IF a homeless man was getting changed under the bridge & was seen by ANYONE, not a thing would happen nor would any charge be brought onto that "poor soul" who has no home! But again, Scott, who bc he is well educated and well known (for so MANY POSITIVE REASONS) should be in a differnet category! It's hilarious how much you are on this forum, you really should indulge yourself on your young children's lives instead of trying to ruin someone else's. First at home lesson you could teach your kids tomorrow after school should be... Never get changed next to your car bc hundreds of people that dont know you will bash your name ALL over the Internet! Happy Sunday dear!

Garth Books

11:26 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

This message is for Ms. Simpkins, Duchess, Dirk, Francis Dams...My guestimate is that the four of you are very simple minded people who want so desperately to get back at the Democrats for all of their years in power by seizing on a mistake by a very popular person to delight in pretending this is their downfall...and relishing every second of trying to capitalize on it for perhaps more power of your own in the community. Oh, so to a few he is not popular. I guarantee that from the stupid things you say and write...he could care less if you aren't a fan or a friend. I can probably bet though if you saw him tomorrow you would smile and say a hello and when he passes, stab him in the back in the same way you do when you write this high school like crap. As I hinted at before... if we make a line for each of you for former classmates, both college and highschool, former coaches and teachers, friends in the community, coworkers, fellow parishners, organization members, well known county wide humanitarians...oh and Scott Kintzing got to head one of those lines...I can guarantee all of you together would not have a line of people that will have Scott's back and attest to his good character. I wonder if any of you have ever left West Deptford...as you sound downright stupid. Sweet Dreams you little Devils you.

Duchess

9:23 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

I think you will find he was doing a bit more than just getting changed next to his car, Wifeofacop. The truth hurts lady, plain and simple. I hope you have a great week! Oh and stay away from Oakview School, there are some very strange people lurking around there!

WifeofaCop

9:50 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

The truth does hurt Duchess, and let's face it... You are very judgmental, uneducated and someone who LOVES to stir the pot... Probably with little friends! I know, i did hear hear there are weird people at Oakview school, right around 3 pm when you are there picking up your kids. If love to know what Scott did that you are oh so angry about. And news flash..... YOU will be surprised when the video is shown and you see him, next to HIS car, take off sweaty clothes and put on nice clothes To go onto his next charity meeting, The Touchdown Club.... GET A LIFE LADY!
#duchesslovesdrama

Duchess

10:26 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get over it lady, what is your problem??????? You are one bitter and twisted character and you are getting really boring now, please go away. Oh and there is a very long list from many, many people of reasons why they are angry with Scott and how he has let them down, but as I said before you are getting very dull and boring and I don't have the time, inclination or patience.

Patch_comments_icon

Lauren Burgoon

10:28 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

Now we're just spinning wheels here in the comments. They're shut down. Any additional stories on this subject will have open comments sections.

The editor has closed comments for this article.
 

The West Deptford Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks