Public-Meeting Laws Were Not Violated in West Deptford, Judge Rules
Resident Gary Kuehnapfel claimed three West Deptford GOP committeemen broke open meeting laws, but a judge ruled otherwise. The mayor called Kuehnapfel's lawsuit politically motivated.
West Deptford officials—including two who hadn't taken office yet—did not violate state laws by holding a private meeting discussing town business, a judge ruled this week.
Superior Court Judge Eugene McCaffery Jr. ruled against West Deptford resident Gary Kuehnapfel's lawsuit that a Dec. 28, 2011, meeting violated the Open Public Meeting Act (OPMA) and the Open Public Records Act (OPRA).
The meeting included Deputy Mayor Sean Kilpatrick and Raymond Chintall and Samuel Cianfarini, then committeemen-elect, as well as township attorney Anthony Ogozalek and Brandon Umba, a West Deptford Republican Party member.
Kuehnapfel filed his complaint on June 28, 2012, alleging that the Republican township committee members had conducted secret meetings, in which they interviewed prospective township professionals and decided on a new insurance broker. With Kilpatrick, Chintall and Cianfarini present, Kuehnapfel argued, the gathering violated the spirit of OPMA, which says that meetings with a majority of officials must be open to the public.
But, McCaffery ruled Feb. 27, Chintall and Cianfarini were not yet public officials at the 2011 meeting. They would not be sworn into office until a week later. OPMA doesn't specifically address the status of officials elected, but not yet sworn into office, and it's not the court's place to put words in the Legislature's mouth, McCaffery said. (Click on the PDF, above, for the full 11-page decision.)
“I believe I speak for both Deputy Mayor Sean Kilpatrick and Committeeman Samuel Cianfarini when I thank Judge McCaffery for setting the record straight,” Chintall said in a statement released by the West Deptford GOP.
Kuehnapfel also alleged that West Deptford's failure to produce a Dec. 23, 2011, letter to Traveler’s Insurance, informing them of the switch in insurance brokers on April 17, 2012, was a violation of OPRA. The letter, which was sent out on township letterhead, was only signed by Kilpatrick, Chintall and Cianfarini.
McCaffery denied the claim and ruled that the letter to Traveler’s Insurance was not government record. The decision goes on to say that Kilpatrick did in fact respond to the plaintiff's request by forwarding more than 30 pages of document, including emails from Nov. 8, 2011, to Jan. 5, 2012. However, as no copy of the Dec. 23, 2011, letter had been made or given to the township clerk, McCaffery ruled that the letter was not government record and did not violate OPRA.
Kuehnapfel was the plaintiff in the Sunoco settlement lawsuit, and Chintall said his complaints were politically motivated.
“In his published finding, Judge McCaffery denied Mr. Kuehnapfel’s complaint that a violation occurred, proving the lawsuit was a frivolous attempt on the part of the Democratic Party to smear the good work our new GOP majority is taking to correct the devastating policies created by that party over the past two decades,” Chintall said.
The failed suit by Kuehnapfel was his second filed against the township committee in 2012. In April 2012, McCaffery ruled in favor of Kuehnapfel, stating that the entire township committee had violated OPMA by failing to disclose the terms of a $15 million settlement between the township and Sunoco in regard to the tax appeal suit. As a result, the township committee was forced to scrap the settlement.
Keeping up to date throughout the day: follow West Deptford Patch on Facebook.
Ernest Kraus
9:38 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
It is time for Mr. Kuehnapfel to be brought to trail for filing frivolous lawsuits and be made to reimburse West Deptford for the legal fees.
Occupant
9:38 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
This is an appropriate time for a counter suit against Sen. Sweeney and Mr. Kuehnapfel to recoup the townships legal fees. We all knew this was just another Democrat machine tactic.
Marty Blenheim
10:09 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
No surprise here that GOP judge McCaffery rules in favor of GOP
Wayne Klotz
3:01 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
Amen, Marty! How true it is, right occupant & Gang?
ironhead
8:10 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
g ain't it funny how the son of one of the best men the republicians ever had ruled in their favor .his father was a true fair and square man on both sides of the table never swayed by party line vote not like todays politicians. Big gene was a great man in his day who always looked out for the people all the people friend or foe' i hope his sons merits bode well for the ground work his late father has laid before him for as you will reap you shall sow tough' shoes to fill
Samantha McCall
10:45 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
Interesting, Judge McCaffrey ruled in Mr. Kuehnapfel's favor the first suit, and in favor of the mayor and committeeman in the second suit, but that isn't good enough for the democrats. What do you people want????? Everything????? I didn't hear anything against the democratic judge when she ruled in favor of Fulton Bank? Please stop with your BS, it is becoming exhausting, back up your claims with some facts, PLEASE! BTW, Mr. Sweeney can you please reimburse your town for your frivolous lawsuits!
Occupant
10:52 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Damn straight Samantha ...and don't forget the lackey Gary (whatever the heck his name is pronounced). Fair is fair.
barney clotz
10:52 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013
what they have to do now is recoup the expences incurred by this nonsensical lawsuit.Gary payup or get it from your buddy Sweeney.
once again the gop of WD is proving that they are for real.
this town is certainly headed in the right direction. the democrats in the past pillaged the residents of this community.things are really looking on the bright side.
Wayne Klotz
1:18 pm on Saturday, March 2, 2013
Samantha, occupany & the new nit wit! Please get real! You want to talk about B. S. how about the CIMINO story about missing money that was not missing? Oops, did I hit a truth nerve gang?!
Occupant
10:36 am on Sunday, March 3, 2013
We won you lost Kutzy LMAO, LOL, Nyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk
Samantha McCall
10:36 am on Sunday, March 3, 2013
Wayne..........this is what happened with Fulton Bank......"The judge found the township was bound by the original loan guaranty signed in 2001, but she did not rule on the issue of whether the $4.1 million had been properly accounted for." I don't know about you, but I certainly don't like paying for something that I did not receive. A lot of the amenities listed in that contract were not delivered.
Wayne Klotz
12:48 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013
Can you , with the brains, I think, prove that the last administration was at fault? Oh, wait, I thought that somebody said that they were not at fault!
LostWDPride
4:07 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013
Gerry White and company signed off with the words on the loan "unconditional", which meant the bank could do whatever they please...and ultimately the township still had to pay that loan...even if 4 million was not for construction. Please read the facts before you speak. You are embarrassing good WD Democrats.