.

Eagles Go as Vick Goes

If Michael Vick doesn't hold onto the ball in 2012/13, the Eagles could be in for another lost year.

One of the most intriguing aspects of the upcoming Eagles season is which version of Michael Vick will show up. He had an outstanding stretch for most of 2010, but followed that up with average-at-best play for most of 2011.

Vick's regression was troubling. Offensive turnovers were the biggest reason the team had such a disastrous campaign and Vick was the main culprit.

More than any other statistic, turnover margin indicates the success of an NFL team. In 2010, the Eagles won the division while finishing in the top five in the NFL in turnover margin. In 2011, the team finished tied for last in the league in that category and, predictably, had a terrible season.

From 2010 to 2011, Vick lost nearly twenty points from his QB rating. He went from being the fourth-ranked passer in the NFL to fourteenth, primarily because he threw more than twice as many interceptions in 2011 than he had in 2010.

In addition to his interception woes, Vick still ran effectively, but his rushing TD total decreased from nine in 2010 to one in 2011.

The reason this decreased production from Vick is so troublesome going forward is because in 2010, the NFL had not seen Vick in a starting role since 2006. Fans have to worry that Vick’s decreased effectiveness was due to other teams adjusting defensively to his unique style of play.

Vick’s performance in his first seven or eight games in 2010 was nothing short of miraculous, as he confused the opposition routinely. There was a sharp decline thereafter.

Then in the 2010 postseason, the Eagles were one-and-done. They lost a home playoff game in which Vick was pedestrian. The season ended, fittingly, on an ill-advised heave from Vick that was intercepted in the end zone.

The 2011 season saw a sluggish Vick struggle through the first half of the season, throwing as many interceptions as touchdowns. Then he got injured and missed three games. By the time he returned, the remaining four games were effectively meaningless.

So was it just a down year for Mike Vick? Was it a down year because he was plagued by injuries? If so, will he be able to stay healthy this upcoming season? The answers to these questions will determine if the Eagles made the right choice to give him a $100 million contract and hand the franchise over to him.

Some conflicting remarks from Vick himself have also clouded the issue. Ominous is Vick’s lack of recognition of his responsibility for the Eagles' lost 2011 season. He noted that he had to cut down his turnovers, and then said he didn’t think the Eagles fell short as a result of his turnovers.

Vick also said he knew he had to be more cautious in order to avoid injury, while at the same time noting that he only knew one way to play.

Andy Reid and the coaching staff have their work cut out for them to drill it into their quarterback that he has to stay healthy and protect the ball.

In a January 31, 2012 press conference, Andy Reid noted that Vick needs to stay healthy and limit turnovers.

Reid said at that time that Vick needed to study this offseason to accomplish these goals. Fans can only hope Vick has the work ethic to do just that. The Eagles' success in 2012 is more dependent on Vick’s health and ball security than anything else.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Mike Diviney July 11, 2012 at 05:59 PM
Agree with establishing a running game, which they have done a better job of- see Shady's production last year. However, if their goal is to get the ball out of their playmaking QB's hands, they have problems too big to overcome. I have some misgivings about Vick, but have to admit he's a playmaker. You have to acknowledge what he did in 2010; hanging in the pocket, firing strikes downfield, running when he had to, and get him back to that. It's on the coaches to do so.
Mike Diviney July 11, 2012 at 06:01 PM
You're right, but I'm not going to accuse them of "gross negligence" before it even happens. If they judge that whomever ends up as their backup can win a few games, they'll be held responsible for that when the time comes. If he can, they should be lauded. If he can't, like you said, 1 game often makes the difference, and they'll be crucified. But we're not there yet.
J D IN TENNESSEE July 11, 2012 at 08:29 PM
I agree with Jack. Mike Vick needs to mature his game. That is, trust his coaches and offensive line to do their jobs and play with in him self. Focus on where his talents are today ...not where his skills were back in college. Time to become a leader instead of trying to force plays. Otherwise..no one knows the plan on or off the field.
Christian Giudice July 11, 2012 at 10:48 PM
Great point about how teams figured out and adapted to Vick. It is alarming how quickly he went from as you said "miraculous" to "pedestrian." Thanks for the article, can't wait to check out the next one.
Mike Diviney July 11, 2012 at 11:01 PM
All about getting him back to what we saw in 2010. Big Red has to figure out how to adjust to the adjustments.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »