.

Democrats, Republicans Wrangle Over Value of Eagle Point

The Democrats say the complex is severely undervalued in the current settlement, while the Republicans say they've gotten more than what a judge might say is the value.

West Deptford Democrats added fuel to the fire in the debate over whether the settlements with Sunoco and Coastal/El Paso over longstanding property tax disputes over the are a fair deal, citing a difference of more than $2.5 billion dollars in the appraised worth of the property and what the settlement spells out as its value.

And that’s just for the Sunoco years.

The Democrats released the appraisal figures, which they said they had to acquire via an Open Public Record Act filing, as part of a letter mailed out to township residents—the same figures are below—which attacked the Republicans for what Committeewomen Denice DiCarlo and Donna Szymborski called a rushed deal.

While the property tax refund agreed to in the settlement is close to what the two Democrats said would be acceptable, they said the low-balled property value and the $2.55 million tax bill it brings for Sunoco—a figure DiCarlo said Sunoco floated to get the assessment where it wanted—is a bad move in the long term.

“That’s just leaving a lot of money on the table,” DiCarlo said.

While DiCarlo said she has no desire to see either the Sunoco or Coastal/El Paso cases end up in court, she said more work is left to get the settlements to the point where they’re the best deal.

“I think there’s a way we can make this happen,” she said. “We have to fight harder for the taxpayers—this is a lot of money.”

The Coastal/El Paso settlement, which the Democrats said had effectively been rammed through on the back of the Sunoco deal, presents its own set of challenges, not least because of the lack of supporting documentation, DiCarlo said.

While Sunoco’s challenge to their property taxes involved an encyclopedic case folder the size of a Manhattan phone book, the Coastal/El Paso documentation added up to a few spreadsheets on four pieces of paper.

“I just don’t know how you get there,” she said.

Besides the value of the two settlements, DiCarlo criticized the way the Republicans have structured the financing to try to minimize the up-front tax hit, which she said could add between $2 and $3 million to the cost of the deal because it’s such a long-term debt.

"They just want to look at tax impact," DiCarlo said.

The two Democrats were joined in their criticism by State Senate President Stephen Sweeney, who weighed in the deal via a letter to the editor published in the Gloucester County Times, which savaged the Republicans’ move to settle.

“A decision to refund $32 million to oil companies that have turned their backs on West Deptford should involve all key stakeholders, not just a rookie mayor and committeeman going up against seasoned corporate experts at tax negotiations,” Sweeney wrote. “I am sorry to say that (Ray) Chintall and (Sam) Cianfarini allowed West Deptford taxpayers to have their pockets picked in a big way.”

But the Republicans slammed the release of what they claimed was privileged information, while at the same time defending the settlement.

In a letter released at the end of last week, Mayor Ray Chintall, Deputy Mayor Sean Kilpatrick and Committeeman Sam Cianfarini claimed the appraisal values are sensitive information that potentially damages the township’s legal strategy, should the matters end up in court

“This is not in the best interest of the people of West Deptford,” they wrote.

And while the appraisals show a much higher value than the settlement, the Republicans said those values don’t reflect the reality of the situation, and cited tax court Judge Joseph C. Small’s assertion that prior sale prices could determine the value of the refinery.

With that in mind, the Republicans pointed to the fact that the settlement establishes values for Eagle Point well above its 2004 sale price of $111 million.

Republican township committee candidate Jeff Hansen, meanwhile, called into question combined donations totaling more than $30,000 to the Democrats from the two firms representing both sides in the case—Archer and Greiner, which has represented Sunoco in the appeals, and Nowell Amoroso Klein Bierman, which represents the township.

Hansen suggested the Democrats have an interest in stretching out the appeals, given there are potentially donations rolling in from the two groups of attorneys as long as it continues—Archer and Greiner donated last year, part of a massive fundraising effort by the Democrats, though David Nowell’s last donation to the Democratic executive committee came in October 2010, according to reports filed with the Election Law Enforcement Commission.

“It’s a big conflict of interest,” Hansen said.

But DiCarlo dismissed that idea, noting her campaign received no money directly from Nowell Amoroso Klein Bierman, and questioned whether that presented a double standard.

“If it’s a conflict of interest, does that mean (the Republicans) can’t work with the insurance brokers?” she said.

Beyond just the contributions, DiCarlo noted her dissatisfaction with the special counsel for tax appeals from Nowell Amoroso Klein Bierman.

“I’ve made it very clear that I don’t think John Lloyd’s been doing a great job,” she said.

Appraised value (millions) Settlement value (millions) Difference (millions) 2004 $225 $134 $91 2005 $300 $134 $166 2006 $530 $128 $402 2007 $700 $126 $574 2008 $770 $121 $649 2009 $575 $122 $453 2010 $375 $124 $251 Total $3,475 $889 $2,586
WDNeedsHelp May 22, 2012 at 07:37 PM
Agreed, but if it does go to court and we lose (which we will) then the blame will squarely be on the backs of Dicarlo and Symborski, I really hope they think long and hard about pissing off 20K people and trying to remain in the town after that.....I know I wouldn't...
Bryan Littel May 22, 2012 at 07:37 PM
If you'll remember, I'm the one who broke the story about their donations from professionals right before the election last year: http://westdeptford.patch.com/articles/township-professionals-donations-at-issue-in-west-deptford-committee-race That speaks for itself. As for Comcast, they've dumped tons of money into Assembly and Senate campaigns throughout the state. Sweeney's hardly alone in that regard - and has gotten significantly less than some other candidates, Democrats and Republicans alike.
ThomasJefferson May 22, 2012 at 11:39 PM
Are you willing to risk it all the the settlement is fair? No matter how long it has gone on, they should not get more than they deserve. To say that the only legit value is the sale price 8 years ago is not valid. That is why there are assessments to make sure everyone pays their fair share regardless of fluctuating markets. THe gap in the numbers is no small amount. Why not investigate i the value discrepancy. To say , " well those guys really screwed up, at least this is better" is not the answer and is really unacceptable.
ThomasJefferson May 22, 2012 at 11:46 PM
Further: The name calling and campaign contribution battle cry is getting old. The new solicitor's firm has a record of donating to campaigns, mostly GOP as well, should every donor be eliminated from goverment employment opportunities. That would leave very few choices. and as long as people accept the "corporations are People" theory, this will never change., Alll political parties take contributions from large corporations.
Ernest Kraus June 01, 2012 at 06:26 PM
WD Mary: I did not sugest that you and the other 99% read the Wall Street Journal. I suggested it to Ms. Di Carlo, employed by Comcast in a financial position and to Ms Szymborski, employed by Wells Fargo Bank. I also suggested it to Senator Sweeny who had his name mentioned in an editorial and had not seen it. I had to drop a copy at his office. These are people that should be reading financial papers. As far as the value of the refinery and what was paid in the previous sale, it is a negotiated price between a willing buyer and a willing seller. One would also expectthat the buyer would know the value and would not pay more then what it is worth. This is far different from an accessor that puts a price on all things. I'm not sure how one can acqurately value houses, gas stations, shopping centers and refineries. One last thing to the nay sayers; have the integrity to put ypour name on what you write.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »