No Decision Yet in Sunshine Law Suit Against Republicans

Judge Eugene McCaffrey Jr. asks for more analysis as to whether secret meetings in December violated state law.

A judge’s decision is still weeks away on whether secret meetings of the three Republican members of West Deptford’s township committee violated the state’s Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA), after extensive arguments by the attorneys involved in the case Friday.

Superior Court Judge Eugene McCaffrey Jr. gave plaintiff’s attorney John Trimble Jr. and West Deptford solicitor Anthony Ogozalek Jr. two weeks to file supplemental briefs in the case, citing a need to see case law and further analysis.

“The primary issue…the one I want some additional authority on, has to do with the application of the Sunshine Law to those that are not yet sworn in but elected,” McCaffrey said.

That came after about an hour and a half of arguments, both in the judge’s chambers and in open court, which mostly focused on Trimble’s argument a December meeting—which Ogozalek admitted took place—by then-elect members Ray Chintall and Sam Cianfarini and sworn member Sean Kilpatrick violated OPMA because they did the township’s business behind closed doors.

A 1991 unpublished court decision out of Atlantic County, Messick v. Brigantine, which Trimble cited in his argument was objected to by Ogozalek, since Trimble didn’t provide a copy of the entire decision—and in fact, Trimble said he hadn’t been able to obtain a full copy, and was citing what had been published in the 2012 edition of the New Jersey Local Government Deskbook.

With that route blocked, Trimble argued in general terms the meeting, where the Republicans at least interviewed candidates for township engineer, had violated the spirit of OPMA.

“You can’t do on Friday something that would be illegal on Monday,” Trimble said. “The intent of the Sunshine Law is to get the secrecy out of government.”

But McCaffrey then questioned the mechanism for transitioning between control from one political party to another, given the need to have certain professionals—the solicitor, especially—in place ahead of reorganization.

“How do they make that decision?” McCaffrey said.

Trimble suggested several alternatives, including putting off professional appointments beyond the reorganization meeting, but acknowledged there should be some practical course to accomplish that—though he indicated it should still be done in public.

Though the judge said it’s relatively common practice for what he termed “insurgent groups”—new majorities coming into power—to undertake those kinds of discussions ahead of being sworn into power, Trimble said the Republicans’ secret meeting was no less a violation because of that.

“That doesn’t make it right,” he said.

Given the meeting resulted in no legally binding appointments, McCaffrey also questioned how it would’ve violated the law.

“The ultimate decision…occurred on reorganization,” he said. “That’s a distinction that bears underscoring.”

But despite the fact the meetings may not have been legally binding, Trimble said what mattered was the violation of the spirit of OPMA.

“The business of the government was done in secrecy,” he said.

After spending more than a half-hour grilling Trimble, Ogozalek launched a brief defense of the Republicans, centering his argument on the fact that Chintall and Cianfarini had only been elected and had not yet formally joined the committee.

“They were unsworn—that’s the meat of the argument,” Ogozalek said.

Beyond that, Ogozalek argued, as he had in his brief, that the secret meeting was about how picking various professionals would affect the Republican Party, referencing the fact that they wouldn’t have rehired former solicitor Michael Angelini, given he’d donated thousands to their opponents’ campaign.

“They were going to appoint people they trusted…who were going to support them in their conservative ideals,” Ogozalek said.

The other issue of a letter on township letterhead issued by the three Republicans prior to the reorganization didn’t by itself represent an OPMA violation, McCaffrey said, though he did call it inappropriate.

“That was ill-advised,” the judge said. “That’s quite a different issue.”

While Ogozalek declined to comment afterward, saying the judge’s words spoke for themselves, Trimble rehashed some of his argument, decrying what he called a move toward more secrecy in government.

“There’s no question what they did…violated the intent of the Sunshine Law,” Trimble said.

None of the three Republicans were in attendance, though Democratic committeewoman Denice DiCarlo watched the proceedings from the back of the room, and said she was “appalled” by Ogozalek’s political justification for the secret December meeting.

“In my mind, this is wrong—it’s not open, it’s not transparent,” she said. “He may be defending the township in this scenario, but that doesn’t represent me.”

Michael Nesbitt September 22, 2012 at 12:19 PM
Yet another judge grills chintall and cianfarini for their poor decision making abilities. This has become a common occurrence under this group of clowns.
Occupant September 23, 2012 at 11:23 PM
How did you think that happened idiot when they were not in the courtroom? Oh wait, there was a clown in the courtroom sitting in the rear... what was her name again???
Wayne Klotz September 24, 2012 at 12:13 AM
at it again,occupant, I see! Looks like ray and Sam are costing us taxpayers Money again!! and yet you clowns wanted a change. well, you got it!!sam and ray complained about debt but these two just dug us even deeper into debt!!!!!
Wayne Klotz September 24, 2012 at 02:24 PM
after reading today's paper about the fraud hotline put in by these two, I sat what a waste of my taxdoars! who is paying for this? not ray or Sam! BUT US TAXPAYERS ARE WHICH IS a WASTE OF MONEY THAT THESE TWO SAID ABOUT THE LAST ADMINISTRATION ! WHAT A JOKE THESE TWO ARE!!!
redneckwillie3 September 24, 2012 at 02:31 PM
there you again Wayne it's not costing the taxpayers anything because they are the defendents,the democRATS are footing the bill. it certainly isn't gary pufenagel. Trimble is getting a nice paycheck from the county democrats,A suit which their not going to win.have a nice day Wayne
Wayne Klotz September 24, 2012 at 03:00 PM
redneckwillie3, I see you are here again not making any sense! if you could read right my last comment was about the fraud hotline that these two are wasting time with. but I guess that's ok with you and the repuliwaste party!
redneckwillie3 September 24, 2012 at 08:17 PM
wayne i'm not going to argue with you anymore I know your a sick man you have health issues and I don't want to make you feel any worse than you do.So enjoy life to the fullest and keep on venting if it makes you happy.FARE THEE WELL
Wayne Klotz September 24, 2012 at 09:43 PM
is that a promise? I am one healthy person who will do anything to protect my township that includes going to meetings at township hall writing articles and telling the people the truth about ray and Sam!!!!
redneckwillie3 September 24, 2012 at 10:35 PM
Wayne Wayne you could have let it go.you are nothing more than a moranic radical that don't know what end is up. your hometown,what are you king this belongs to 20,000 residents and i'm sure 70% do not like what has transpired over the last 20 years. So you protect " YOUR TOWN " and at the same time become the laughing stock of this blog. one more thing what about the truth about what the dumocrats have done to this town,you affilating with them makes you just as guilty of fraud. here's a nice slogan for you " HERE I COME TO SAVE THE DAY "
Wayne Klotz September 24, 2012 at 10:53 PM
I'll bet that 70% of the people are the so called republicans who screamed at thier own in Sean kilpatrick who voted to keep the summer concerts that ray and Sam wanted to get rid of!!! THANKS, SEAN!!!
WDNeedsHelp September 26, 2012 at 06:53 PM
Comment below says it all, frivioulous Democrat Lawsuit, sponsored by the same people who now endorse and campaign for DiCarlo. Given the meeting resulted in no legally binding appointments, McCaffrey also questioned how it would’ve violated the law. “The ultimate decision…occurred on reorganization,” he said. “That’s a distinction that bears underscoring.”


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »